Regulation
Breaking: Supreme Court Limits SEC’s Use of In-House Trials in Fraud Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ed0f/3ed0f31c876129fe995ea51dc3192fd22911dffe" alt="Gary Gensler Sec 1.jpg"
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) cannot use in-house trials for civil fraud complaints, granting defendants the right to a jury trial in federal court. This verdict, reached with a 6-3 majority, significantly affects how regulatory agencies operate.
The Court’s decision challenges the long-standing practice where the SEC relied on administrative proceedings to resolve civil fraud complaints. Previously, the agency collected over $5 billion in civil penalties during the 2023 fiscal year, though it needs to be clarified how much of this was from in-house trials. With the recent ruling, the SEC has reduced the number of cases it handles this way and is awaiting the Court’s decision.
This is a developing story
The post Breaking: Supreme Court Limits SEC’s Use of In-House Trials in Fraud Cases appeared first on CoinGape.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a701a/a701a50cb2b9b8db5629a377bb138508d09fbccd" alt=""